TheSunIsLeaking/DorkNet
3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/DorkSquadRR/DorkNet.git synced 2026-10-25 23:18:44 -07:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: Update appVersion to 2023.03.21 and enhance avatar-item linkage in store service

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Alexa
2026-06-28 01:31:21 +03:00
parent 50e03af296
commit 7da20f2047
7 changed files with 107 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
DorkNet.Server/Controllers/Commerce/CommerceCatalogController.cs
+44 -2
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using DorkNet.Server.Services;
using DorkNet.Server.Controllers.API.Avatar.V4;
namespace DorkNet.Server.Controllers.Commerce;
@@ -85,6 +86,31 @@ public class CommerceCatalogController(StoreService store, DomainConfig domain)
{
var available = i.IsActive && (i.AvailableUntil == null || i.AvailableUntil > DateTime.UtcNow);
var imageUrl = string.IsNullOrEmpty(i.ImageName) ? "" : $"https://cdn.{apex}/{i.ImageName}";
// Avatar-item linkage — THE thing that makes wardrobe items appear in
// the Shop's Clothing tab. The 2023 client does NOT categorize a SKU by
// any field on the SKU itself; instead StoreItemListModel resolves the
// SKU to the client's baked AvatarItem (by GUID) and reads that item's
// OutfitType to place it in a tab. With no AvatarItemId the resolve
// returns OutfitType = -1, the item matches no Clothing/Consumables
// filter, and the whole Shop renders empty even though all 1531 SKUs
// parsed fine. The GUID is the tail of the "wardrobe-{guid}" slug; ship
// it (plus the OutfitType) under the keys the client reads
// (AvatarItemId / AvatarItemType — verified vs 2023 ISIL store-item
// context types EMBCEDNHFLB / CLIANCNHNIE). Coloured variants
// (wardrobe-colored-*) resolve through a different descriptor path and
// are left alone here.
string? avatarItemId = null;
int? avatarItemType = null;
if (i.Slug.StartsWith("wardrobe-", StringComparison.Ordinal)
&& !i.Slug.StartsWith("wardrobe-colored-", StringComparison.Ordinal))
{
var guid = i.Slug["wardrobe-".Length..];
avatarItemId = guid;
if (AvatarItemsController.TryGetOutfitType(guid, out var ot))
avatarItemType = ot;
}
return new Dictionary<string, object?>
{
// Identity / naming — every alias the watch's strict
@@ -116,6 +142,14 @@ public class CommerceCatalogController(StoreService store, DomainConfig domain)
["Slug"] = i.Slug,
["slug"] = i.Slug,
// Avatar-item join keys (see resolve block above). Emitted both at
// top level and inside Data so whichever the client reads, the
// SKU→AvatarItem resolve succeeds and the item lands in a tab.
["AvatarItemId"] = avatarItemId,
["avatarItemId"] = avatarItemId,
["AvatarItemType"] = avatarItemType,
["avatarItemType"] = avatarItemType,
["Name"] = i.DisplayName,
["name"] = i.DisplayName,
["DisplayName"] = i.DisplayName,
@@ -205,13 +239,21 @@ public class CommerceCatalogController(StoreService store, DomainConfig domain)
// string / null sub-purchase are valid.
["Data"] = new Dictionary<string, object?>
{
["GiftDropIds"] = Array.Empty<int>(),
["AvatarItemId"] = avatarItemId,
["AvatarItemType"] = avatarItemType,
// Link this SKU to its gift-drop store card (the EFFIEFEFHHB
// record `storefronts/v3/giftdropstore` builds, GiftDropId =
// this same id) so the client can resolve the card that carries
// the AvatarItemId join key. Empty here = SKU points at no card.
["GiftDropIds"] = new[] { (int)(i.Id & 0x7fffffff) },
["Message"] = string.Empty,
["SubscriptionPurchase"] = (object?)null,
},
["data"] = new Dictionary<string, object?>
{
["giftDropIds"] = Array.Empty<int>(),
["avatarItemId"] = avatarItemId,
["avatarItemType"] = avatarItemType,
["giftDropIds"] = new[] { (int)(i.Id & 0x7fffffff) },
["message"] = string.Empty,
["subscriptionPurchase"] = (object?)null,
},