mirror of
https://github.com/DorkSquadRR/DorkNet.git
synced 2026-10-25 15:08:47 -07:00
f43ce3f368
Player caps were two settings pretending to be one. RoomEntity.MaxCapacity is
what the ROOM advertises (and what matchmaking hands to
RoomInstance.MaxCapacity); RoomSceneEntity.MaxPlayers is what ONE sub-room caps
itself at. The details payload was reading its room-level MaxPlayers off
sub-room 0, which collapsed the two — editing a sub-room would have moved the
room's advertised capacity with it. It now reports MaxCapacity, and each entry
in SubRooms[] reports its own figure.
The in-game path already existed (the "Max Player Count in This Subroom"
slider). Admin had no way to reach it at all — only zip import ever set it — so
a cap could not be corrected on a room the admin does not own:
GET api/admin/v1/rooms/{id}/subrooms
PUT api/admin/v1/rooms/{id}/subrooms/{subRoomId}/maxplayers {"MaxPlayers":n}
subRoomId is the sub-room's ORDER INDEX — the id the client and the rest of the
wire use — not the row's primary key. Row ids are serialised as strings because
the admin SPA is JavaScript and mangles integers past 2^53. Both paths clamp to
1..80, matching rooms/{id}/props: 0 would make a sub-room unjoinable, and a
shared range stops the two settings disagreeing about what is legal.
The test drives the client's exact wire rather than a convenient one:
NLDBPDCNNCF.MNBPCGJNLNP builds a BLNOGFGHIIF whose single JSON key is
"maxPlayers" and PUTs it — this route does NOT form-encode like most of its
siblings, so a form-bodied test would have passed while the real client's body
went unread. It also asserts the reply carries the new value, since the client
deserialises it back as FGCPNAACHIK.