[api] fix multiple issues with events

apps/api/src/events-db.ts

@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ import {
 } from '@repo/domain'
 
 /**
- * Schema DDL (mirror of migrations/0006_event.sql + 0007_event_attendee.sql, sans any
- * seed rows).
+ * Schema DDL (mirror of migrations/0006_event.sql + 0007_event_attendee.sql +
+ * 0010_event_tag.sql + 0028_event_id_seq.sql, sans any seed rows).
  */
 export const SCHEMA_DDL: string[] = [
 	`CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS event (
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ export const SCHEMA_DDL: string[] = [
 		PRIMARY KEY (event_id, tag)
 	)`,
 	`CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_event_tag_tag ON event_tag (tag)`,
+	// The id sequence: AUTOINCREMENT so an id is never handed out twice, whatever gets
+	// deleted. See {@link nextEventId}. The migration also seeds it past the existing
+	// events; on a fresh database there are none, so the seed is omitted here.
+	`CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS event_id_seq (
+		id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT
+	)`,
 ]
 
 /**
@@ -67,19 +73,29 @@ export const SCHEMA_DDL: string[] = [
  * Only `going` counts toward an event's `AttendeeCount`: interested is a maybe, and
  * declining is recorded rather than deleted so the client can show the player their own
  * answer (and so changing your mind is an update, not an insert).
+ *
+ * `pending` is not an answer: it's the row a bulk invite writes for the invitee, before
+ * they've said anything. It's what the client shows as an open invitation — an invite
+ * that landed as Going looked like the player had already accepted. Only the server
+ * writes it; `respond` won't take it as a `Type`.
  */
 export const EVENT_RESPONSE = {
 	going: 0,
 	interested: 1,
 	cantGo: 2,
+	pending: 3,
 } as const
 
-/** The response types, for validating an incoming `Type`. */
-const EVENT_RESPONSE_VALUES: number[] = Object.values(EVENT_RESPONSE)
+/** The answers a player may give — every type but `pending`, for validating an incoming `Type`. */
+const EVENT_ANSWER_VALUES: number[] = [
+	EVENT_RESPONSE.going,
+	EVENT_RESPONSE.interested,
+	EVENT_RESPONSE.cantGo,
+]
 
-/** Whether a number is one of the three response types. */
+/** Whether a number is one of the three answers a player can give (never `pending`). */
 export function isEventResponseType(value: number): boolean {
-	return EVENT_RESPONSE_VALUES.includes(value)
+	return EVENT_ANSWER_VALUES.includes(value)
 }
 
 /**
@@ -174,9 +190,9 @@ interface EventRow {
 }
 
 /**
- * A tag as the 2023 build's `v2` envelope carries it: the PascalCase form of the stored
- * `{ tag, type }` pair. NOT the lowercase pair the v1 read serves — three casings of one
- * tag, and the client parses each in exactly one place.
+ * A tag as the `v2` envelope carries it to a build newer than 20230414: the PascalCase
+ * form of the stored `{ tag, type }` pair. NOT the lowercase pair the v1 read serves —
+ * three casings of one tag, and the client parses each in exactly one place.
  */
 export interface PlayerEventEnvelopeTag {
 	Tag: string
@@ -190,9 +206,11 @@ export interface PlayerEventEnvelopeTag {
  *
  * `Tags` is the one field whose shape depends on the caller's BUILD, because Rec Room
  * changed it under the same unversioned path rather than minting a `v3`: the 2023 build
- * parses `[{ Tag, Type }]` and the 2025 build parses `["celebration"]`. Serving either
- * one to the other build leaves the event's tag chips empty — the decoder drops what it
- * can't read rather than erroring. {@link toEventResult} picks; nothing else should.
+ * (20230414 and older) parses `["celebration"]` and anything newer parses
+ * `[{ Tag, Type }]`. Serving either one to the other build leaves the event's tag chips
+ * empty — the decoder drops what it can't read rather than erroring.
+ * {@link toEventResult} picks; nothing else should. `TagModifyResult.Tags` is NOT part of
+ * this: it is a `List<string>` to every build.
  */
 export interface PlayerEventEnvelope extends PlayerEventBase {
 	Tags: string[] | PlayerEventEnvelopeTag[]
@@ -218,17 +236,18 @@ export interface PlayerEventResult {
  * tags — pass what `getEventTags` returns, so the answer reflects what was actually
  * written rather than what was asked for.
  *
- * `legacyTags` picks the shape of `PlayerEvent.Tags` for the caller's build (see
- * {@link PlayerEventEnvelope}): the 2023 pairs when set, the 2025 names when not. It
- * changes nothing else — `TagModifyResult.Tags` is a name list to both builds.
+ * `pairedTags` picks the shape of `PlayerEvent.Tags` for the caller's build (see
+ * {@link PlayerEventEnvelope}): the `{ Tag, Type }` pairs of a build newer than 20230414
+ * when set, the 2023 build's bare names when not. It changes nothing else —
+ * `TagModifyResult.Tags` is a name list to both builds.
  */
 export function toEventResult(
 	event: PlayerEvent,
 	tags: EventTag[] = [],
-	legacyTags = false
+	pairedTags = false
 ): PlayerEventResult {
 	const names = tags.map((t) => t.tag)
-	const carried = legacyTags ? tags.map((t) => ({ Tag: t.tag, Type: t.type })) : names
+	const carried = pairedTags ? tags.map((t) => ({ Tag: t.tag, Type: t.type })) : names
 	return {
 		PlayerEvent: { Tags: carried, ...toEventBase(event) },
 		Result: 0,
@@ -620,14 +639,11 @@ export async function createEvent(
 	creatorPlayerId: number,
 	input: EventInput
 ): Promise<PlayerEvent> {
-	// Sequential id: one past the current max (the table starts empty).
-	const row = await db
-		.prepare('SELECT COALESCE(MAX(id), 0) + 1 AS next FROM event')
-		.first<{ next: number }>()
+	const id = await nextEventId(db)
 	const now = Date.now()
 	const startTime = input.startTime ?? eventTime(now)
 	const event: PlayerEvent = {
-		PlayerEventId: row?.next ?? 1,
+		PlayerEventId: id,
 		CreatorPlayerId: creatorPlayerId,
 		ImageName: input.imageName ?? null,
 		RoomId: input.roomId ?? 0,
@@ -665,46 +681,51 @@ export async function createEvent(
  * per player per event, so changing your mind is an update rather than a second RSVP.
  * The event's `AttendeeCount` is recomputed from the table afterwards.
  *
- * Returns the updated event, or null when there's no such event. Anyone who can see an
- * event may respond to it, the creator included (they're already Going from create, and
- * nothing stops them declining their own event).
+ * Returns the updated event and the player's response row as it now stands (the route
+ * pushes that row on the `PlayerEventResponseChanged` frame), or null when there's no
+ * such event. Anyone who can see an event may respond to it, the creator included
+ * (they're already Going from create, and nothing stops them declining their own event).
  */
 export async function setEventResponse(
 	db: D1Database,
 	eventId: number,
 	playerId: number,
 	status: number
-): Promise<PlayerEvent | null> {
+): Promise<{ event: PlayerEvent; response: EventAttendeeRow } | null> {
 	const event = await getEventById(db, eventId)
 	if (event === null) return null
 
-	await db
+	const response = await db
 		.prepare(
 			`INSERT INTO event_attendee (event_id, player_id, status, responded_at)
 			 VALUES (?1, ?2, ?3, ?4)
-			 ON CONFLICT (event_id, player_id) DO UPDATE SET status = ?3, responded_at = ?4`
+			 ON CONFLICT (event_id, player_id) DO UPDATE SET status = ?3, responded_at = ?4
+			 RETURNING rowid AS id, *`
 		)
 		.bind(eventId, playerId, status, eventTime(Date.now()))
-		.run()
+		.first<EventAttendeeRow>()
 
 	const updated: PlayerEvent = { ...event, AttendeeCount: await countGoing(db, eventId) }
 	await writeEvent(db, updated)
-	return updated
+	// An upsert with RETURNING always yields the row it inserted or updated.
+	return { event: updated, response: response! }
 }
 
 /**
- * Add invited players to an event as Going — the bulk invite. Returns the updated
+ * Add invited players to an event as Pending — the bulk invite. Returns the updated
  * event (with its recounted `AttendeeCount`) and the rows actually created, or null
  * when there's no such event.
  *
  * An invite only ever INSERTS: a player who already has a row keeps the answer they
- * gave, so being invited can't flip a decline back to Going, and re-inviting the same
- * player is a no-op rather than a reset. Since the rows land as Going, the invited
- * count toward `AttendeeCount` from the moment they're invited — see the route.
+ * gave, so being invited can't reset an answer to Pending, and re-inviting the same
+ * player is a no-op. The rows land as Pending (3), not Going: the invitee hasn't
+ * accepted anything yet, so they don't count toward `AttendeeCount` until they answer
+ * through `respond` — see the route.
  *
  * `added` is what `RETURNING` gave back, so it holds exactly the new rows: a conflict
- * inserts nothing and returns nothing. That's what the route notifies on — a player
- * whose existing answer was left alone gets no frame, because nothing changed for them.
+ * inserts nothing and returns nothing. That's who the route sends the invitation Message
+ * to — a player whose existing answer was left alone gets nothing, because nothing
+ * changed for them.
  *
  * Ids are deduplicated by the composite primary key; an empty list is a no-op that
  * still returns the event.
@@ -728,7 +749,7 @@ export async function inviteToEvent(
 					 ON CONFLICT (event_id, player_id) DO NOTHING
 					 RETURNING rowid AS id, *`
 				)
-				.bind(eventId, playerId, EVENT_RESPONSE.going, at)
+				.bind(eventId, playerId, EVENT_RESPONSE.pending, at)
 		)
 	)
 	const added = inserts.flatMap((r) => r.results)
@@ -738,6 +759,22 @@ export async function inviteToEvent(
 	return { event: updated, added }
 }
 
+/**
+ * The players who said they're GOING to an event — who the `PlayerEventUpdated` and
+ * `PlayerEventDeleted` frames go to. Interested, declined and Pending rows are left out:
+ * an invitee who hasn't accepted isn't attending, so nothing about the event has changed
+ * for them. The creator is included through their own Going row from create.
+ */
+export async function getGoingPlayerIds(db: D1Database, eventId: number): Promise<number[]> {
+	const { results } = await db
+		.prepare(
+			'SELECT player_id FROM event_attendee WHERE event_id = ?1 AND status = ?2 ORDER BY player_id'
+		)
+		.bind(eventId, EVENT_RESPONSE.going)
+		.all<{ player_id: number }>()
+	return results.map((r) => r.player_id)
+}
+
 /** How many players said they're Going — an event's `AttendeeCount`. */
 export async function countGoing(db: D1Database, eventId: number): Promise<number> {
 	const row = await db
@@ -829,12 +866,31 @@ export async function updateEvent(
 	return updated
 }
 
+/**
+ * Draw the next event id. Sequential and NEVER reused: the id comes from the
+ * `event_id_seq` AUTOINCREMENT counter, which only ever goes up, rather than from
+ * `MAX(id) + 1` over the events themselves — that handed the newest event's id straight
+ * back out once it was deleted, so a replacement event wore the old one's id and
+ * inherited whatever was still filed under it (an invitation message's `PlayerEventId`,
+ * the client's cache). The drawn row is thrown away in the same batch; only the counter
+ * matters, and SQLite keeps that in `sqlite_sequence` regardless of the rows.
+ */
+async function nextEventId(db: D1Database): Promise<number> {
+	const [drawn] = await db.batch<{ id: number }>([
+		db.prepare('INSERT INTO event_id_seq DEFAULT VALUES RETURNING id'),
+		db.prepare('DELETE FROM event_id_seq'),
+	])
+	const id = drawn.results[0]?.id
+	if (id === undefined) throw new Error('event_id_seq returned no id')
+	return id
+}
+
 /**
  * Delete an event and everything hanging off it — its RSVPs (`event_attendee`) and its tags
  * (`event_tag`) — in one batch, so a cancelled event can't leave rows behind that the
- * attendee counts and the `#tag` search would still find. Event ids are assigned in
- * sequence and never reused, but orphan rows would still be counted against whatever id
- * they name.
+ * attendee counts and the `#tag` search would still find. Event ids are drawn from a
+ * sequence that never reuses one (see {@link nextEventId}), so a deleted event's id is
+ * retired with it — but orphan rows would still be counted against whatever id they name.
  *
  * Answers the event as it was, so the caller can report what it deleted; `null` when there
  * was no such event.

apps/api/src/openapi.ts

@@ -1150,15 +1150,16 @@ export const PlayerEventBaseDto = PlayerEventDto.omit({ State: true, ImageName:
  * image.
  *
  * `Tags` has two shapes, picked from the caller's build: Rec Room reshaped it without
- * minting a new path, so a build newer than `20230414` gets the tag NAMES and every older
- * one (and any caller whose token names no build) gets the `{ Tag, Type }` pairs. Neither
- * is the lowercase `{ tag, type }` the v1 read serves.
+ * minting a new path, so a build newer than `20230414` gets the `{ Tag, Type }` pairs and
+ * that build, every older one, and any caller whose token names no build get the tag
+ * NAMES. Neither is the lowercase `{ tag, type }` the v1 read serves. `TagModifyResult.Tags`
+ * is a name list to every build.
  */
 export const PlayerEventEnvelopeDto = PlayerEventBaseDto.extend({
 	Tags: z
 		.union([z.array(z.string()), z.array(z.object({ Tag: z.string(), Type: z.int() }))])
 		.describe(
-			'The event’s tags: names for a build newer than 20230414, `{ Tag, Type }` pairs for ' +
+			'The event’s tags: `{ Tag, Type }` pairs for a build newer than 20230414, names for ' +
 				'that build and older'
 		),
 })
@@ -1176,7 +1177,7 @@ export const PlayerEventResultDto = z.object({
 	Result: z.int().describe('0 = success'),
 	TagModifyResult: z.object({
 		Result: z.int().describe('0 = success'),
-		Tags: z.array(z.string()).describe('The tags the event now carries'),
+		Tags: z.array(z.string()).describe('The tags the event now carries — names to every build'),
 	}),
 })
 
@@ -1264,7 +1265,9 @@ export const PlayerEventResponseDto = z.object({
 			'When the answer that stands was given — a changed answer updates the row, so this ' +
 				'moves with it rather than recording the player’s first response'
 		),
-	Type: z.int().describe('0 Going, 1 Interested, 2 Can’t go'),
+	Type: z
+		.int()
+		.describe('0 Going, 1 Interested, 2 Can’t go, 3 Pending (invited, not yet answered)'),
 })
 
 /** `POST /api/playerevents/v1/respond` JSON body — how the caller is answering. */

apps/api/src/routes/events.ts

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import { Hono } from 'hono'
 import { describeRoute } from 'hono-openapi'
 
-import { Accessibility, GAME_VERSION } from '@repo/domain'
+import { Accessibility, createNotification, GAME_VERSION, MessageType } from '@repo/domain'
 import { logger } from '@repo/hono-helpers'
 import { validateAndGetVersion } from '@repo/jwt'
 
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import {
 	getEventsByIds,
 	getEventsByRoom,
 	getEventTags,
+	getGoingPlayerIds,
 	getLiveEvents,
 	inviteToEvent,
 	isEventResponseType,
@@ -70,7 +71,11 @@ import {
 import { createReport } from '../reports-db'
 
 import type { Context } from 'hono'
-import type { PlayerEventResponsePayload } from '../../../notify/src/notification-payloads'
+import type { StoredNotification } from '@repo/domain'
+import type {
+	PlayerEventIdPayload,
+	PlayerEventResponsePayload,
+} from '../../../notify/src/notification-payloads'
 import type { App } from '../context'
 import type { EventAttendeeRow, EventInput, EventTag, PlayerEvent } from '../events-db'
 
@@ -105,12 +110,84 @@ async function notifyEventCreated(
 }
 
 /**
- * Push a `PlayerEventResponseChanged` (83) to each player a bulk invite just added —
- * what puts the event on their screen without a refetch, since an invite writes their
- * response row for them.
+ * Push one frame to every player who is GOING to an event — the audience for a change
+ * to the event itself. Only Going rows (see {@link getGoingPlayerIds}): a player who is
+ * merely invited, interested or declined has nothing on screen to update. The creator
+ * is among them through their own Going row, so their own edit or delete reaches their
+ * client too, the way `PlayerEventCreated` does.
  *
- * Only the players who actually gained a row are notified: an invite that hit an
- * existing answer changed nothing, so there is nothing to tell them about.
+ * `playerIds` is passed in rather than read here because a delete has to read them
+ * BEFORE the rows go. Hub failures are logged and swallowed, and one player's failure
+ * doesn't stop the rest: the change is already stored by the time this runs.
+ */
+async function notifyGoing(
+	c: Context<App>,
+	playerIds: number[],
+	type: NotificationType,
+	payload: Record<string, unknown>,
+	playerEventId: number
+): Promise<void> {
+	const hub = c.env.RECFLARE_NOTIFICATIONS_HUB.getByName(HUB_INSTANCE)
+	for (const playerId of playerIds) {
+		try {
+			await hub.notifyPlayer(playerId, type, payload)
+		} catch (err) {
+			logger.error('failed to push player event notification', {
+				notificationType: type,
+				playerEventId,
+				playerId,
+				error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err),
+			})
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * Push a `PlayerEventUpdated` (81) to everyone Going to an event that was just edited —
+ * the whole-event update and every single-field edit alike — carrying the event as it
+ * now stands, in the same camelCase {@link toEventNotification} projection the
+ * `PlayerEventCreated` frame uses: the two share a payload shape on the client
+ * (`PlayerEventPayload` in notification-payloads.ts documents its fields; the decoder
+ * accepts either casing).
+ */
+async function notifyEventUpdated(
+	c: Context<App>,
+	event: PlayerEvent,
+	tags: EventTag[]
+): Promise<void> {
+	const payload: Record<string, unknown> = { ...toEventNotification(event, tags) }
+	await notifyGoing(
+		c,
+		await getGoingPlayerIds(c.env.DB, event.PlayerEventId),
+		NotificationType.PlayerEventUpdated,
+		payload,
+		event.PlayerEventId
+	)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Push a `PlayerEventDeleted` (82) to everyone who was Going to an event that was just
+ * deleted, so it leaves their screen. The frame is just the id — there is no event left
+ * to carry. `playerIds` must have been read before the delete took the RSVP rows with it.
+ */
+async function notifyEventDeleted(
+	c: Context<App>,
+	playerIds: number[],
+	playerEventId: number
+): Promise<void> {
+	const payload = { PlayerEventId: playerEventId } satisfies PlayerEventIdPayload
+	await notifyGoing(c, playerIds, NotificationType.PlayerEventDeleted, payload, playerEventId)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Push a `PlayerEventResponseChanged` (83) to a player who just ANSWERED an event
+ * (`POST /api/playerevents/v1/respond`) — what puts the event on their screen without a
+ * refetch. This is the responder's own frame, carrying their own row.
+ *
+ * An INVITE does not send this. What an invitee gets is the invitation as a Message
+ * (see {@link pushEventInvitation}); their Pending row is not a response, and the
+ * client populates the event from this frame only once they have actually responded.
+ * Sending it on invite made the event appear as if the player had already answered.
  *
  * The frame carries BOTH nested objects the client's decoder expects. That is not
  * optional — several of its handlers dereference one level down with no null guard, so
@@ -120,30 +197,100 @@ async function notifyEventCreated(
  * response in the PascalCase {@link toEventResponse} one the RSVP list serves; the
  * decoder accepts either casing, so the two need not agree.
  *
- * Hub failures are logged and swallowed, and one player's failure doesn't stop the
- * rest: the invites are already stored by the time this runs.
+ * Hub failures are logged and swallowed: the answer is already stored by the time this
+ * runs.
+ */
+async function notifyResponseChanged(
+	c: Context<App>,
+	event: PlayerEvent,
+	response: EventAttendeeRow
+): Promise<void> {
+	const payload = {
+		PlayerEvent: { ...toEventNotification(event) },
+		PlayerEventResponse: { ...toEventResponse(response) },
+	} satisfies PlayerEventResponsePayload
+	try {
+		await c.env.RECFLARE_NOTIFICATIONS_HUB.getByName(HUB_INSTANCE).notifyPlayer(
+			response.player_id,
+			NotificationType.PlayerEventResponseChanged,
+			payload
+		)
+	} catch (err) {
+		logger.error('failed to push PlayerEventResponseChanged notification', {
+			playerEventId: event.PlayerEventId,
+			playerId: response.player_id,
+			error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err),
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * Tell each player a bulk invite just added about it: the invitation as a Message of
+ * type 81 `PlayerEventInvitation`, stored and pushed as `MessageReceived` — see
+ * {@link pushEventInvitation}. That Message is the whole of what an invitee is sent; the
+ * `PlayerEventResponseChanged` frame is theirs only once they answer.
+ *
+ * Only the players who actually gained a row are notified: an invite that hit an
+ * existing answer changed nothing, so there is nothing to tell them about. One player's
+ * failure doesn't stop the rest: the invites are already stored by the time this runs.
  */
 async function notifyInvited(
 	c: Context<App>,
+	inviterId: number,
 	event: PlayerEvent,
 	added: EventAttendeeRow[]
 ): Promise<void> {
-	const hub = c.env.RECFLARE_NOTIFICATIONS_HUB.getByName(HUB_INSTANCE)
-	const PlayerEvent = { ...toEventNotification(event) }
 	for (const row of added) {
-		const payload = {
-			PlayerEvent,
-			PlayerEventResponse: { ...toEventResponse(row) },
-		} satisfies PlayerEventResponsePayload
-		try {
-			await hub.notifyPlayer(row.player_id, NotificationType.PlayerEventResponseChanged, payload)
-		} catch (err) {
-			logger.error('failed to push PlayerEventResponseChanged notification', {
-				playerEventId: event.PlayerEventId,
-				playerId: row.player_id,
-				error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err),
-			})
-		}
+		await pushEventInvitation(c, inviterId, row.player_id, event.PlayerEventId)
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * Store and push the invitation Message a bulk invite shows the invitee: a Message of
+ * type 81 `PlayerEventInvitation` from the inviter, delivered as `MessageReceived` and
+ * kept in the inbox (`GET /api/messages/v2/get`) so a player who was offline still finds
+ * it. The event is named twice — on the row's own `PlayerEventId` column, and as `Data`,
+ * the event id as a STRING (a Message's `Data` is always a string on the wire).
+ *
+ * The row is committed before the push; a hub failure is logged and swallowed, since the
+ * invite itself is already stored.
+ */
+async function pushEventInvitation(
+	c: Context<App>,
+	fromPlayerId: number,
+	toPlayerId: number,
+	playerEventId: number
+): Promise<void> {
+	let message: StoredNotification
+	try {
+		message = await createNotification(c.env.DB, {
+			FromPlayerId: fromPlayerId,
+			ToPlayerId: toPlayerId,
+			Type: MessageType.PlayerEventInvitation,
+			Data: String(playerEventId),
+			PlayerEventId: playerEventId,
+		})
+	} catch (err) {
+		logger.error('failed to store PlayerEventInvitation message', {
+			playerEventId,
+			toPlayerId,
+			error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err),
+		})
+		return
+	}
+	try {
+		await c.env.RECFLARE_NOTIFICATIONS_HUB.getByName(HUB_INSTANCE).notifyPlayer(
+			toPlayerId,
+			NotificationType.MessageReceived,
+			{ ...message }
+		)
+	} catch (err) {
+		logger.error('failed to push PlayerEventInvitation MessageReceived notification', {
+			notificationId: message.Id,
+			playerEventId,
+			toPlayerId,
+			error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err),
+		})
 	}
 }
 
@@ -151,12 +298,13 @@ async function notifyInvited(
  * Wrap an event in the v2 envelope for THIS caller's build.
  *
  * Rec Room reshaped `PlayerEvent.Tags` without minting a new path, so the same endpoint
- * owes the 2023 build `[{ Tag, Type }]` and the 2025 build `["celebration"]`. The build
+ * owes the 2023 build `["celebration"]` and anything newer `[{ Tag, Type }]`. The build
  * comes off the token's `rn.ver` claim — the request carries no version of its own — and
  * the split is the one `/api/gameconfigs/v1/all` already makes: anything NEWER than
- * `GAME_VERSION` (20230414) is the 2025 client; that build, anything older, and a request
- * with no readable token version all get the 2023 shape. Builds are date-stamped, so they
- * order as strings.
+ * `GAME_VERSION` (20230414) gets the pairs; that build, anything older, and a request
+ * with no readable token version all get the 2023 names. Builds are date-stamped, so they
+ * order as strings. `TagModifyResult.Tags` is a name list to every build — only the
+ * inline field moves.
  *
  * Like the other version gates here the claim is unverified — a client that lies about its
  * build only empties its own tag chips.
@@ -164,7 +312,7 @@ async function notifyInvited(
 async function eventResult(c: Context<App>, event: PlayerEvent, tags: EventTag[]) {
 	const version = await validateAndGetVersion(c.req.raw, await c.env.JWT_SECRET.get())
 	const isModernBuild = version !== null && version > GAME_VERSION
-	return toEventResult(event, tags, !isModernBuild)
+	return toEventResult(event, tags, isModernBuild)
 }
 
 /**
@@ -180,6 +328,7 @@ async function eventResult(c: Context<App>, event: PlayerEvent, tags: EventTag[]
  *
  * These edits are creator-only like the whole-event update, and they go through the same
  * {@link updateEvent}, so a patch touching one field leaves the rest of the event alone.
+ * Like it, each pushes a `PlayerEventUpdated` to everyone Going.
  */
 function editEventField(
 	parse: (c: Context<App>, event: PlayerEvent) => Promise<EventInput | null>
@@ -199,7 +348,9 @@ function editEventField(
 		if (input === null) return c.body(null, 400)
 		const updated = await updateEvent(c.env.DB, eventId, input)
 		// updateEvent only returns null when the row vanished, which the read above rules out.
-		return c.json(await eventResult(c, updated!, await getEventTags(c.env.DB, eventId)))
+		const tags = await getEventTags(c.env.DB, eventId)
+		await notifyEventUpdated(c, updated!, tags)
+		return c.json(await eventResult(c, updated!, tags))
 	}
 }
 
@@ -546,8 +697,13 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 				'event. Answers the same `{ Result, TagModifyResult, PlayerEvent }` envelope the ' +
 				'v2 writes do, carrying the event with its updated count, so the client can ' +
 				're-render from the response.\n\n' +
-				'A body with no usable `PlayerEventId`, or a `Type` outside 0–2, is a 400; an ' +
-				'unknown event is a 404.',
+				'The caller is also pushed a `PlayerEventResponseChanged` frame carrying the event ' +
+				'and their new response row — this frame, not the invite, is what populates the ' +
+				'event on the client. An invitee answering Pending → Going gets it here like ' +
+				'anyone else.\n\n' +
+				'A body with no usable `PlayerEventId`, or a `Type` outside 0–2, is a 400 — 3 ' +
+				'Pending is the server’s own mark for an unanswered invite, not an answer a ' +
+				'player can give; an unknown event is a 404.',
 			security: AUTHED,
 			requestBody: jsonBody(PlayerEventRespondRequest, 'The event and the answer'),
 			responses: {
@@ -570,9 +726,10 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 			// Going would silently inflate the count.
 			if (!Number.isInteger(eventId) || !isEventResponseType(type)) return c.body(null, 400)
 
-			const updated = await setEventResponse(c.env.DB, eventId, id, type)
-			if (updated === null) return c.body(null, 404)
-			return c.json(await eventResult(c, updated, await getEventTags(c.env.DB, eventId)))
+			const result = await setEventResponse(c.env.DB, eventId, id, type)
+			if (result === null) return c.body(null, 404)
+			await notifyResponseChanged(c, result.event, result.response)
+			return c.json(await eventResult(c, result.event, await getEventTags(c.env.DB, eventId)))
 		}
 	)
 
@@ -640,20 +797,30 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 	)
 
 	// Bulk invite — the "invite friends" button on an event. Adds the invited players to
-	// the same `event_attendee` table an RSVP writes to, as Going.
+	// the same `event_attendee` table an RSVP writes to, as Pending (3) — an open
+	// invitation, not an acceptance.
 	.post(
 		'/api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite',
 		describeRoute({
 			tags: ['Events'],
 			summary: 'Invite players to an event',
 			description:
-				'Adds the invited players to the event as Going — the same `event_attendee` rows ' +
-				'an RSVP writes, so an invited player shows up in `…/responses` and counts toward ' +
-				'`AttendeeCount` immediately, without having answered.\n\n' +
+				'Adds the invited players to the event as Pending (`Type` 3) — the same ' +
+				'`event_attendee` rows an RSVP writes, so an invited player shows up in ' +
+				'`…/responses` with an open invitation. Pending is not Going: the invitee does not ' +
+				'count toward `AttendeeCount` until they answer through `…/respond`. (Inviting as ' +
+				'Going made the invitation look already accepted on the client.)\n\n' +
 				'An invite never overwrites an answer: a player who already responded keeps what ' +
-				'they said, so inviting someone who declined does not flip them back to Going, and ' +
+				'they said, so inviting someone who declined does not reset them to Pending, and ' +
 				're-inviting is a no-op. The caller is skipped (they are already on the list), as ' +
 				'are duplicate ids.\n\n' +
+				'Each newly invited player is sent the invitation as a Message of type 81 ' +
+				'`PlayerEventInvitation` from the caller — stored in their inbox ' +
+				'(`GET /api/messages/v2/get`) and pushed as `MessageReceived`, with the event id ' +
+				'on `PlayerEventId` and, as a string, in `Data`. That is all an invitee gets: no ' +
+				'`PlayerEventResponseChanged` is pushed on invite — that frame is what `…/respond` ' +
+				'sends once they answer, and is what populates the event on their client. ' +
+				'Players whose existing answer was left alone get nothing.\n\n' +
 				'The caller must be on the event themselves — its creator, or a player with a ' +
 				'response row of any kind. Anyone else gets 403: an invite adds attendees, so it ' +
 				'is not something a passer-by can do. Answers the same ' +
@@ -662,7 +829,7 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 			security: AUTHED,
 			requestBody: jsonBody(PlayerEventBulkInviteRequest, 'The event and who to invite'),
 			responses: {
-				200: json(PlayerEventResultDto, 'The event, with its updated attendee count'),
+				200: json(PlayerEventResultDto, 'The event (its attendee count is unchanged by an invite)'),
 				400: { description: 'Missing `PlayerEventId` or `InvitedPlayerIds` (empty body)' },
 				401: UNAUTHORIZED_RESPONSE,
 				403: { description: 'The caller is not on the event (empty body)' },
@@ -702,7 +869,7 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 			]
 			const result = await inviteToEvent(c.env.DB, eventId, invited)
 			// inviteToEvent only returns null when the row vanished, which the read above rules out.
-			await notifyInvited(c, result!.event, result!.added)
+			await notifyInvited(c, id, result!.event, result!.added)
 			return c.json(await eventResult(c, result!.event, await getEventTags(c.env.DB, eventId)))
 		}
 	)
@@ -781,6 +948,9 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 				'Deletes an event the caller created, along with its RSVPs and its tags — an event ' +
 				'whose attendee rows outlived it would still be counted, and its tags would still ' +
 				'answer `#tag` searches.\n\n' +
+				'Everyone who was GOING to the event (the creator included) is pushed a ' +
+				'`PlayerEventDeleted` frame naming the event id, so it leaves their screen; ' +
+				'interested, declined and still-Pending invitees are not.\n\n' +
 				'Creator only: anyone else gets 403, and an unknown event 404. Answers the v2 ' +
 				'envelope with `PlayerEvent` and `TagModifyResult` both null — the event is gone, ' +
 				'so there is nothing for the client to redraw from, and it reads only `Result`. ' +
@@ -804,7 +974,10 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 			if (existing === null) return c.body(null, 404)
 			if (existing.CreatorPlayerId !== id) return c.body(null, 403)
 
+			// Who to tell has to be read BEFORE the delete: it takes the RSVP rows with it.
+			const going = await getGoingPlayerIds(c.env.DB, eventId)
 			await deleteEvent(c.env.DB, eventId)
+			await notifyEventDeleted(c, going, eventId)
 			// Both payload fields are null here — the delete envelope is not the one the other
 			// v2 routes answer with. Nothing is left to redraw, and the client reads `Result`.
 			return c.json(EVENT_DELETED_RESULT)
@@ -857,6 +1030,9 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 				'The id, the creator and the attendee count are not editable: ownership doesn’t ' +
 				'transfer and RSVPs aren’t set by hand. Creator only — anyone else gets 403, and ' +
 				'an unknown event is 404. Answers the same envelope as create.\n\n' +
+				'Everyone who is GOING to the event (the creator included) is pushed a ' +
+				'`PlayerEventUpdated` frame carrying the edited event; interested, declined and ' +
+				'still-Pending invitees are not. The single-field edits push the same frame.\n\n' +
 				'The 24-hour window cap applies to what the post RESOLVES to, not to what it ' +
 				'carries: moving the start alone still has to leave a window that ends after it ' +
 				'and runs no longer than a day against the STORED end.',
@@ -891,7 +1067,9 @@ export const eventRoutes = new Hono<App>({ strict: false })
 			if (eventInputRejection(input, existing) !== null) return c.body(null, 400)
 			const updated = await updateEvent(c.env.DB, eventId, input)
 			// updateEvent only returns null when the row vanished, which the read above rules out.
-			return c.json(await eventResult(c, updated!, await getEventTags(c.env.DB, eventId)))
+			const tags = await getEventTags(c.env.DB, eventId)
+			await notifyEventUpdated(c, updated!, tags)
+			return c.json(await eventResult(c, updated!, tags))
 		}
 	)
 

apps/api/src/test/integration/api.test.ts

@@ -8034,10 +8034,10 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 		expect(body.Result).toBe(0)
 		expect(body.PlayerEvent.Name).toBe('Enveloped')
 		// The tags ride inline on the event AND in TagModifyResult. Inline they take the
-		// caller's build shape — this token names no build, so the 2023 `{ Tag, Type }` pairs
-		// (PascalCase: not the lowercase pairs the v1 read's `tags` serves). TagModifyResult
-		// is names to every build.
-		expect(body.PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual([{ Tag: 'music', Type: 0 }])
+		// caller's build shape — this token names no build, so the 2023 bare names (a newer
+		// build gets the PascalCase `{ Tag, Type }` pairs). TagModifyResult is names to every
+		// build.
+		expect(body.PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(['music'])
 		expect(body.TagModifyResult).toEqual({ Result: 0, Tags: ['music'] })
 		// No `State`, and the broadcast instance is present and null.
 		expect(body.PlayerEvent).not.toHaveProperty('State')
@@ -8046,7 +8046,7 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 
 	test('the v2 envelope shapes PlayerEvent.Tags per the caller’s build', async () => {
 		// Rec Room reshaped this field without minting a new path, so one endpoint owes two
-		// shapes: the 2023 build parses `{ Tag, Type }` pairs, the 2025 build bare names.
+		// shapes: the 2023 build parses bare names, anything newer `{ Tag, Type }` pairs.
 		// Serving either to the wrong build empties the event's chips instead of erroring.
 		// A tag of this test's own: the `#tag` search tests assert exact result sets, and the
 		// four events below would join any set they share a tag with.
@@ -8066,16 +8066,18 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 			return (await res.json()) as PlayerEventResult
 		}
 
-		// Newer than 20230414 is the 2025 client; that build, an older one, and a token naming
-		// no build at all are all the 2023 client. Builds are date-stamped, so they compare as
-		// strings.
-		expect((await created('20250718.01')).PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(NAMES)
-		expect((await created('20230414')).PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(PAIRS)
-		expect((await created('20220101')).PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(PAIRS)
+		// Newer than 20230414 gets the pairs; that build, an older one, and a token naming
+		// no build at all are all the 2023 client and get names. Builds are date-stamped, so
+		// they compare as strings.
+		expect((await created('20250718.01')).PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(PAIRS)
+		expect((await created('20230414')).PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(NAMES)
+		expect((await created('20220101')).PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(NAMES)
 		const legacy = await created()
-		expect(legacy.PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(PAIRS)
-		// Only the inline field moves: TagModifyResult carries names to both builds.
+		expect(legacy.PlayerEvent.Tags).toEqual(NAMES)
+		// Only the inline field moves: TagModifyResult carries names to both builds — it
+		// really is a List<string> on the client, so the pairs must never land there.
 		expect(legacy.TagModifyResult).toEqual({ Result: 0, Tags: NAMES })
+		expect((await created('20250718.01')).TagModifyResult).toEqual({ Result: 0, Tags: NAMES })
 
 		// The gate is on the ENVELOPE, not on the create: the read and the field edits answer
 		// the same shape, so a client that made an event and one opening it cold agree.
@@ -8088,8 +8090,8 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 					})
 				).json()) as PlayerEventResult
 			).PlayerEvent.Tags
-		expect(await read('20250718.01')).toEqual(NAMES)
-		expect(await read()).toEqual(PAIRS)
+		expect(await read('20250718.01')).toEqual(PAIRS)
+		expect(await read()).toEqual(NAMES)
 	})
 
 	test('GET /api/playerevents/v2/:eventId serves the same envelope as the write', async () => {
@@ -8682,7 +8684,7 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 		).toBe(401)
 	})
 
-	test('POST /api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite adds invitees as Going without overwriting answers', async () => {
+	test('POST /api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite adds invitees as Pending without overwriting answers', async () => {
 		const event = await create({ RoomId: 3, Name: 'Invite Test', StartTime: at(HOUR) })
 		const id = event.PlayerEventId
 
@@ -8698,8 +8700,9 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 		expect(res.status).toBe(200)
 		const body = (await res.json()) as PlayerEventResult
 		expect(body.Result).toBe(0)
-		// The creator plus the two newly invited — 43 keeps their decline, so isn't counted.
-		expect(body.PlayerEvent.AttendeeCount).toBe(3)
+		// Only the creator: an invite is Pending, not Going, so the two newly invited don't
+		// count until they answer — and 43 keeps their decline.
+		expect(body.PlayerEvent.AttendeeCount).toBe(1)
 
 		const responses = (await (await get(`/api/playerevents/v1/${id}/responses`)).json()) as Array<{
 			PlayerId: number
@@ -8708,10 +8711,10 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 		expect(
 			responses.sort((a, b) => a.PlayerId - b.PlayerId).map((r) => [r.PlayerId, r.Type])
 		).toEqual([
-			[2, 0],
+			[2, 3],
 			[42, 0],
 			[43, 2],
-			[187, 0],
+			[187, 3],
 		])
 
 		// Re-inviting is a no-op, not a reset: 43 still declines and the count holds.
@@ -8720,14 +8723,23 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 			{ PlayerEventId: id, InvitedPlayerIds: [187, 43] },
 			'42'
 		)
-		expect(((await again.json()) as PlayerEventResult).PlayerEvent.AttendeeCount).toBe(3)
+		expect(((await again.json()) as PlayerEventResult).PlayerEvent.AttendeeCount).toBe(1)
 
 		// An empty list is a no-op that still answers the event.
 		const none = await post('/api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite', {
 			PlayerEventId: id,
 			InvitedPlayerIds: [],
 		})
-		expect(((await none.json()) as PlayerEventResult).PlayerEvent.AttendeeCount).toBe(3)
+		expect(((await none.json()) as PlayerEventResult).PlayerEvent.AttendeeCount).toBe(1)
+
+		// Accepting the invite is an ordinary respond: Pending becomes Going and counts.
+		const accepted = await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 0 }, '2')
+		expect(((await accepted.json()) as PlayerEventResult).PlayerEvent.AttendeeCount).toBe(2)
+
+		// Pending is the server's mark, not an answer a player can give.
+		expect(
+			(await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 3 }, '187')).status
+		).toBe(400)
 	})
 
 	test('POST /api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite notifies only the players it actually added', async () => {
@@ -8745,17 +8757,57 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 			data: Record<string, Record<string, unknown>>
 		}>
 
-		// One frame, to the one player who gained a row. 43 kept their answer, so nothing
+		// ONE frame, to the one player who gained a row: the invitation Message. No
+		// PlayerEventResponseChanged — a Pending row is not a response; that frame is the
+		// responder's, sent by `respond` once they answer. 43 kept their answer, so nothing
 		// changed for them and nothing is pushed.
 		expect(sent).toHaveLength(1)
 		expect(sent[0]!.playerId).toBe(2)
+		expect(sent[0]!.notificationType).toBe(2) // MessageReceived
+
+		// A PlayerEventInvitation (81) Message from the inviter, naming the event on
+		// PlayerEventId and as a string in Data.
+		expect(sent[0]!.data).toMatchObject({
+			FromPlayerId: 42,
+			ToPlayerId: 2,
+			Type: 81,
+			Data: String(id),
+			PlayerEventId: id,
+		})
+		// Stored under the same id, so an offline invitee finds it on login.
+		const frameId = (sent[0]!.data as unknown as { Id: number }).Id
+		expect(frameId).toBeGreaterThan(0)
+		const inbox = (await (
+			await exports.default.fetch(`${ORIGIN}/api/messages/v2/get`, { headers: await bearer('2') })
+		).json()) as Array<{ Id: number; Type: number; PlayerEventId: number | null }>
+		expect(inbox.find((m) => m.Id === frameId)).toMatchObject({ Type: 81, PlayerEventId: id })
+	})
+
+	test('POST /api/playerevents/v1/respond pushes PlayerEventResponseChanged to the responder', async () => {
+		const hub = env.RECFLARE_NOTIFICATIONS_HUB.getByName('global')
+		const event = await create({ RoomId: 3, Name: 'RSVP Frames', StartTime: at(HOUR) })
+		const id = event.PlayerEventId
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite', { PlayerEventId: id, InvitedPlayerIds: [2] })
+
+		// The invitee accepts: THIS is where their response frame comes from — the frame
+		// that populates the event on their client — carrying their row as it now stands.
+		await hub.fetch('http://do/all', { method: 'DELETE' })
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 0 }, '2')
+		const sent = (await (await hub.fetch('http://do/all')).json()) as Array<{
+			playerId: number
+			notificationType: number
+			data: Record<string, Record<string, unknown>>
+		}>
+		expect(sent).toHaveLength(1)
+		expect(sent[0]!.playerId).toBe(2)
 		expect(sent[0]!.notificationType).toBe(83) // PlayerEventResponseChanged
 
 		// BOTH nested objects are present — the client dereferences them without a null
 		// guard, so a missing one is a NullReferenceException rather than a blank field.
+		// The event carries the count as recomputed AFTER the answer.
 		expect(sent[0]!.data.PlayerEvent).toMatchObject({
 			playerEventId: id,
-			name: 'Invite Frames',
+			name: 'RSVP Frames',
 			attendeeCount: 2,
 		})
 		expect(sent[0]!.data.PlayerEventResponse).toEqual({
@@ -8765,6 +8817,106 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 			CreatedAt: expect.stringMatching(/^\d{4}-\d\d-\d\dT\d\d:\d\d:\d\dZ$/),
 			Type: 0,
 		})
+
+		// Changing the answer pushes again, with the same row id and the new Type — the
+		// upsert updates in place, so the frame's id matches what the RSVP list serves.
+		await hub.fetch('http://do/all', { method: 'DELETE' })
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 2 }, '2')
+		const again = (await (await hub.fetch('http://do/all')).json()) as typeof sent
+		expect(again).toHaveLength(1)
+		expect(again[0]!.data.PlayerEventResponse).toMatchObject({
+			PlayerEventResponseId: sent[0]!.data.PlayerEventResponse!.PlayerEventResponseId,
+			Type: 2,
+		})
+		expect(again[0]!.data.PlayerEvent).toMatchObject({ attendeeCount: 1 })
+	})
+
+	test('a deleted event’s id is never reused by a later create', async () => {
+		// Ids used to be MAX(id) + 1 over the table, so deleting the newest event handed its
+		// id to the next one created — which then inherited everything still filed under
+		// that id outside the event's own rows (an invitation message, the client's cache).
+		const first = await create({ RoomId: 3, Name: 'First', StartTime: at(HOUR) })
+		expect(
+			(await post(`/api/playerevents/v2/delete/${first.PlayerEventId}`, undefined)).status
+		).toBe(200)
+		const second = await create({ RoomId: 3, Name: 'Second', StartTime: at(HOUR) })
+		expect(second.PlayerEventId).toBeGreaterThan(first.PlayerEventId)
+		// And the replacement starts with its own guest list: just its creator.
+		const responses = (await (
+			await get(`/api/playerevents/v1/${second.PlayerEventId}/responses`)
+		).json()) as Array<{ PlayerId: number }>
+		expect(responses.map((r) => r.PlayerId)).toEqual([42])
+	})
+
+	test('editing an event pushes PlayerEventUpdated to everyone Going, and only them', async () => {
+		const hub = env.RECFLARE_NOTIFICATIONS_HUB.getByName('global')
+		const event = await create({ RoomId: 3, Name: 'Before', StartTime: at(HOUR) })
+		const id = event.PlayerEventId
+		// 2 is Going, 43 is Interested, 44 declined, 45 is invited and still Pending.
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 0 }, '2')
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 1 }, '43')
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 2 }, '44')
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite', { PlayerEventId: id, InvitedPlayerIds: [45] })
+
+		const frames = async () =>
+			(await (await hub.fetch('http://do/all')).json()) as Array<{
+				playerId: number
+				notificationType: number
+				data: Record<string, unknown>
+			}>
+
+		// The whole-event update: the creator (Going from create) and 2 hear about it, with
+		// the event as it now stands in the camelCase projection PlayerEventCreated uses.
+		await hub.fetch('http://do/all', { method: 'DELETE' })
+		const res = await post(`/api/playerevents/v2/${id}`, { Name: 'After' })
+		expect(res.status).toBe(200)
+		const sent = await frames()
+		expect(sent.map((s) => [s.playerId, s.notificationType])).toEqual([
+			[2, 81], // PlayerEventUpdated
+			[42, 81],
+		])
+		for (const frame of sent) {
+			expect(frame.data).toMatchObject({ playerEventId: id, name: 'After', attendeeCount: 2 })
+		}
+
+		// A single-field edit pushes the same frame to the same audience.
+		await hub.fetch('http://do/all', { method: 'DELETE' })
+		const renamed = await exports.default.fetch(`${ORIGIN}/api/playerevents/v2/${id}/name`, {
+			method: 'PUT',
+			headers: { ...(await bearer('42')), 'content-type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' },
+			body: new URLSearchParams({ name: 'Renamed' }),
+		})
+		expect(renamed.status).toBe(200)
+		const again = await frames()
+		expect(again.map((s) => [s.playerId, s.notificationType])).toEqual([
+			[2, 81],
+			[42, 81],
+		])
+		expect(again[0]!.data).toMatchObject({ name: 'Renamed' })
+	})
+
+	test('deleting an event pushes PlayerEventDeleted to everyone who was Going, and only them', async () => {
+		const hub = env.RECFLARE_NOTIFICATIONS_HUB.getByName('global')
+		const event = await create({ RoomId: 3, Name: 'Doomed', StartTime: at(HOUR) })
+		const id = event.PlayerEventId
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 0 }, '2')
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/respond', { PlayerEventId: id, Type: 1 }, '43')
+		await post('/api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite', { PlayerEventId: id, InvitedPlayerIds: [45] })
+
+		await hub.fetch('http://do/all', { method: 'DELETE' })
+		const res = await post(`/api/playerevents/v2/delete/${id}`, undefined)
+		expect(res.status).toBe(200)
+		const sent = (await (await hub.fetch('http://do/all')).json()) as Array<{
+			playerId: number
+			notificationType: number
+			data: Record<string, unknown>
+		}>
+		// The audience is read before the RSVP rows are deleted with the event; the frame
+		// is just the id, there being no event left to carry.
+		expect(sent).toEqual([
+			{ playerId: 2, notificationType: 82, data: { PlayerEventId: id } }, // PlayerEventDeleted
+			{ playerId: 42, notificationType: 82, data: { PlayerEventId: id } },
+		])
 	})
 
 	test('POST /api/playerevents/v1/bulkInvite is gated on the caller being on the event', async () => {
@@ -9031,11 +9183,9 @@ describe('player events', () => {
 		const path = `/api/playerevents/v2/${event.PlayerEventId}/tags`
 
 		// A bare JSON array, not an object — and a replace, not a merge, so `meetup` goes.
+		// Names, since this token names no build (a newer build would get the pairs).
 		const tagged = await edited(await putJson(path, ['tag1', '#Class']))
-		expect(tagged.Tags).toEqual([
-			{ Tag: 'class', Type: 0 },
-			{ Tag: 'tag1', Type: 0 },
-		])
+		expect(tagged.Tags).toEqual(['class', 'tag1'])
 		// The envelope's TagModifyResult reports the same set the client redraws chips from.
 		const body = (await (await putJson(path, ['workshops'])).json()) as PlayerEventResult
 		expect(body.TagModifyResult).toEqual({ Result: 0, Tags: ['workshops'] })