[msc] make playersettings more efficient

This commit is contained in:
Devin Zuczek
2026-09-30 18:04:56 -04:00
parent 90c808c4a3
commit e00103c6b3
13 changed files with 178 additions and 37 deletions
+1
View File
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ export * from './clubs-db'
export * from './d1-binds'
export * from './images-db'
export * from './password'
export * from './player-settings-kv'
export * from './rooms-db'
export * from './room-instance-db'
export * from './room-comments-db'
+81
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
/**
* The player settings map in the `RECFLARE_PLAYER_SETTINGS` KV namespace.
*
* One key per player, `player:<accountId>`, holding every setting they have as a flat
* `{ [Key]: Value }` record of strings — OOBE state, tutorial mask, chat privacy, the lot.
* The `playersettings` worker owns the namespace but `api`, `match` and `chat` each keep a
* setting of their own in the same map, so every writer merges into the record rather than
* replacing it, and all of them go through here.
*
* KV writes cost roughly ten times a read and are capped at one per second per key, and the
* client is noisy: it re-posts settings it already has at every login and menu change. Every
* write site has to read the map first to merge into it, so comparing the result against what
* was read is free — {@link putPlayerSettingsIfChanged} skips the `put` when the merged map
* is the one already stored.
*/
export type PlayerSettings = Record<string, string>
/** The KV key holding a player's settings. */
export function playerSettingsKey(accountId: number): string {
return `player:${accountId}`
}
/**
* The player's stored settings, or null when they have none. A KV failure THROWS rather than
* reading as "none": a writer that mistook an outage for an empty map would then store its
* one key over everything the player had. Read-only callers that would rather degrade wrap
* this in their own `.catch`.
*/
export async function readPlayerSettings(
kv: KVNamespace,
accountId: number
): Promise<PlayerSettings | null> {
return kv.get<PlayerSettings>(playerSettingsKey(accountId), 'json')
}
/** Whether two settings maps hold the same keys with the same values. Order is irrelevant. */
export function samePlayerSettings(a: PlayerSettings | null, b: PlayerSettings | null): boolean {
const left = a ?? {}
const right = b ?? {}
const keys = Object.keys(left)
if (keys.length !== Object.keys(right).length) return false
return keys.every((key) => key in right && left[key] === right[key])
}
/**
* Store `next` as the player's settings unless it is what `existing` already says, in which
* case nothing is written. Returns whether a write happened.
*
* `existing` is the map the caller read to build `next` from; passing the map it read (not a
* fresh read) is the point — the comparison costs no KV operation.
*/
export async function putPlayerSettingsIfChanged(
kv: KVNamespace,
accountId: number,
existing: PlayerSettings | null,
next: PlayerSettings
): Promise<boolean> {
if (existing !== null && samePlayerSettings(existing, next)) return false
await kv.put(playerSettingsKey(accountId), JSON.stringify(next))
return true
}
/**
* Merge `patch` into the player's settings, writing only if a value actually changed. The
* result carries the merged map (what the player now has) and whether KV was written.
*
* Read-modify-write on KV isn't atomic; racing writers here means one player toggling two
* of their own options in the same instant, which every caller has accepted since before
* this helper existed.
*/
export async function mergePlayerSettings(
kv: KVNamespace,
accountId: number,
patch: PlayerSettings
): Promise<{ settings: PlayerSettings; written: boolean }> {
const existing = await readPlayerSettings(kv, accountId)
const settings: PlayerSettings = { ...existing, ...patch }
const written = await putPlayerSettingsIfChanged(kv, accountId, existing, settings)
return { settings, written }
}